browser_close
Close the active browser session to end automation and release system resources. Use after all browser actions are completed.
Instructions
关闭浏览器
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Close the active browser session to end automation and release system resources. Use after all browser actions are completed.
关闭浏览器
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description must disclose side effects. It only says 'close browser' without mentioning that it closes all pages, terminates the connection, or may cause data loss. This is a significant gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single concise phrase '关闭浏览器' communicates the action with zero wasted words. It is appropriately sized for a parameterless, simple operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (no params, no output schema), the description is fundamentally adequate but lacks behavioral context such as irreversible effects or what happens to open pages. This leaves some ambiguity for an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has no parameters and the schema already provides 100% coverage (empty properties). With zero parameters, the description need not add parameter details; baseline 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states '关闭浏览器' (close browser), a specific verb and resource. It clearly distinguishes from sibling 'browser_close_page' by targeting the entire browser rather than a page.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like browser_close_page. It does not mention end-of-session context or whether this is required after closing all pages.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/91fapiao-cn/playwright-browser-skill'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server