sdg1062x_set_mode_enabled

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are all false, meaning no safety hints are given. The description adds the key behavioral constraint that this only works while output is disabled, which is useful. However, it does not disclose potential side effects, prerequisites (e.g., whether the mode must be configured first), or error behavior. This is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The single sentence is concise and front-loaded with the action. Every word adds value, stating what the tool does and an important condition. No filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although the tool is simple and has an output schema, the complete lack of schema descriptions places a burden on the description to explain all parameters. It only covers the mode values and the output-disabled condition, leaving channel and enabled semantics unexplained. This is a clear gap for a 3-parameter tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It partially does by listing the possible mode values ('modulation, sweep, or burst'), but it does not explain the 'channel' parameter or the 'enabled' boolean beyond the verb 'Enable or disable.' With three required parameters and no schema descriptions, this is insufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool enables or disables modulation, sweep, or burst modes, with a specific condition 'while output is disabled.' It uses a specific verb and resource, and lists the three mode types. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling configuration tools like sdg1062x_configure_modulation, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear usage condition (output must be disabled) but gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like sdg1062x_configure_modulation, sdg1062x_configure_sweep, or sdg1062x_configure_burst. The context is implied rather than explicit, so it earns a 3.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.