dpo2012b_measure

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are all false, providing minimal safety context, and the description does not disclose behavioral aspects such as whether the measurement triggers a state change, blocks, or returns data. The word 'immediate' hints at an action but lacks detail about side effects, errors, or prerequisites. The output schema covers return values, but the behavior beyond that is opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one focused sentence, front-loaded with the action and context. Every word contributes to understanding the tool's core purpose, with no wasted information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite an output schema, the description fails to provide necessary context for a measurement tool: no guidance on measurement parameter choices, no mention of when to use it vs. alternatives, and no behavioral details. The tool is simple but leaves the agent uncertain about the 'measurement' parameter and the operation's side effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It mentions 'CH1 or CH2' for the channel parameter, but the measurement parameter is not elaborated at all, leaving valid values (e.g., FREQUENCY, other measurement types) undocumented. This is insufficient for a 2-parameter tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Take' and clearly identifies the resource (DPO2012B measurement) and scope (CH1 or CH2). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like dpo2012b_acquire_waveform and dpo2012b_get_channel_settings by focusing on immediate measurement, not waveform acquisition or channel settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for quick, single measurements on a specific channel via 'immediate,' but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like dpo2012b_acquire_waveform or how it relates to other measure tools. There are no exclusions or alternative references.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.