agilent33500b_set_mode_enabled

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is not read-only, not idempotent, and not destructive. The description adds no further behavioral context such as mutual exclusion between modes, preconditions, or side effects. It simply restates the toggle action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It efficiently conveys the tool's purpose and the list of supported modes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple setter with an output schema, the description is mostly adequate, but it lacks exact accepted string values for the 'mode' parameter and does not explain the relationship to sibling configure/set tools. The low complexity prevents a lower score.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only provides parameter names with no descriptions or enums, and schema coverage is 0%. The description compensates by listing the supported modes (AM/FM/PM/PWM/FSK/BPSK/SUM, sweep, burst), giving the agent key information about valid 'mode' values. However, exact string casing or syntax is not specified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Enable or disable' and clearly identifies the resource: AM/FM/PM/PWM/FSK/BPSK/SUM, sweep, or burst. This distinguishes it from sibling configuration tools like configure_modulation or configure_sweep.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The enable/disable wording implies this tool is used to toggle modes on or off, but there is no explicit guidance about when to use it versus configure_* tools, nor mention of prerequisites like configuring a mode before enabling it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.