agilent33500b_set_waveform_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description mentions 'with read-back,' which discloses a behavioral trait beyond the annotations. However, it does not explain that some parameters depend on the selected waveform type (e.g., duty cycle only affects square waves) or discuss other side effects. With all annotations false, the description partially carries the burden but leaves gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that front-loads the key actions and parameters. Every word is purposeful, with no redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description gives the core purpose and read-back, but omits critical operational context such as parameter applicability depending on the active waveform. While the output schema covers return values, the conditional behavior of the settable parameters is not explained, leaving the description incomplete for complex usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description essentially restates the parameter names (duty cycle, symmetry, phase, polarity) without adding units, ranges, or interaction details. Since schema description coverage is 0%, the description should compensate but does not provide meaningful semantic addition beyond the titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets specific waveform parameters (duty cycle, ramp symmetry, phase, or output polarity) and includes read-back. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like agilent33500b_set_waveform, which focuses on the basic waveform setup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the listed parameters, but the description does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives or mention any exclusions. It lacks direct guidance on when this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.