Skip to main content
Glama

sogouwebspider

Server Details

Validate Sogou Spider IP addresses. Remote MCP validate_ip tool.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.9/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of ambiguity between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool 'validate_ip' uses a clear verb_noun pattern, consistent with good naming practices.

Tool Count4/5

One tool is minimal, but it is appropriate for the narrow, specific purpose of validating Sogou Spider IPs.

Completeness5/5

The tool fully covers its intended domain: validating whether an IP belongs to Sogou Spider. No gaps exist for this specific task.

Available Tools

1 tool
validate_ipValidate Sogou Spider IPAInspect

Check whether an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine Sogou Spider IP address, verified against Sogou Spider's published IP data on seoapi.com.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ipYesThe IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description mentions verification against published IP data, implying a network lookup, but does not disclose details like response format, error handling, or side effects. Minimal behavioral insight beyond what's stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, well-formed sentence with front-loaded purpose. No redundancy or unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks details about the return value (e.g., boolean or structured response) and error scenarios. Given the tool's simplicity, this omission leaves the agent partially uninformed about invocation results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the description does not add information beyond the schema's parameter description. The agent gains no additional semantics from the tool description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Check', the resource 'IP address', and specifies it's for Sogou Spider IPs only. It includes the verification method against published data, making the purpose highly specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for verifying Sogou Spider IPs, but lacks explicit guidance on when not to use or alternatives. Since there are no sibling tools, the context is clear enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources