Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Validate Cốc Cốc Bot IP addresses. Remote MCP validate_ip tool.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.2/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool 'validate_ip' follows a clear verb_noun pattern; no inconsistency exists.

Tool Count5/5

A single tool is perfectly appropriate for this highly specific purpose of IP validation.

Completeness5/5

The tool fully covers the intended domain: validating whether an IP belongs to Cốc Cốc Bot. No gaps.

Available Tools

1 tool
validate_ipValidate Cốc Cốc Bot IPAInspect

Check whether an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine Cốc Cốc Bot IP address, verified against Cốc Cốc Bot's published IP data on seoapi.com.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ipYesThe IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, but the description clearly indicates this is a read-only check against external data. It does not mention any side effects, rate limits, or response format, but the behavior is straightforward and sufficiently transparent for a validation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that packs all essential information: verb, resource, scope (IPv4/IPv6), and verification source. No extraneous words, effectively front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple validation tool with one parameter, the description covers purpose, source, and IP types. It does not specify the return value format (e.g., boolean), but given no output schema, the description is nearly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema documentation covers the parameter fully, but the description adds value by specifying that both IPv4 and IPv6 are supported and naming the data source (seoapi.com). This enhances understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool validates IPv4 or IPv6 addresses against Cốc Cốc Bot's published IP data. It specifies the exact resource (IP address) and action (validate), and distinguishes from any potential siblings by being specific to Cốc Cốc Bot.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to verify if an IP belongs to Cốc Cốc Bot, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use it vs. alternatives, or when not to use it. Since there are no sibling tools, the lack is less critical but still a gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources