Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Validate Baiduspider IP addresses. Remote MCP validate_ip tool.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion with other tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'validate_ip' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is entirely consistent.

Tool Count5/5

The server has a very narrow purpose—validating Baiduspider IPs—and one tool is exactly appropriate for that scope.

Completeness5/5

The tool fully covers the stated domain: validating Baiduspider IP addresses. There are no other operations needed for this specific purpose.

Available Tools

1 tool
validate_ipValidate Baiduspider IPAInspect

Check whether an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine Baiduspider IP address, verified against Baiduspider's published IP data on seoapi.com.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ipYesThe IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It confirms the tool is read-only and references external data, but does not mention network dependency, rate limits, or caching, which are relevant for a validation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence with no wasted words. It conveys all essential information efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no siblings), the description is mostly complete. However, it could mention the expected return format (e.g., boolean or validation status) for full clarity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (the 'ip' parameter has a description). The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool checks whether an IP is a genuine Baiduspider IP, verified against published data. It is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly tells the user to use this tool for verifying Baiduspider IPs. With no sibling tools, explicit when-not is unnecessary, but mentioning alternatives or prerequisites would improve clarity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server providing IP address lookup capabilities. Enables AI assistants to fetch details about public IP addresses or the user's current device IP.
    98
    ISC
  • F
    license
    -
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Comprehensive email validation MCP server that checks syntax, MX records, disposable domains, role-based accounts, SPF/DKIM, typo suggestions, and risk scoring.

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources