Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Validate CommonCrawl CCBot IP addresses. Remote MCP validate_ip tool.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.6/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no ambiguity. The tool's purpose is clearly distinct.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, naming is inherently consistent.

Tool Count5/5

The server's purpose is narrow (CCBot IP validation), so one tool is perfectly scoped.

Completeness5/5

The single tool fully covers the intended functionality; no gaps are present.

Available Tools

1 tool
validate_ipValidate CommonCrawl CCBot IPAInspect

Check whether an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine CommonCrawl CCBot IP address, verified against CommonCrawl CCBot's published IP data on seoapi.com.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ipYesThe IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that verification is against published IP data on seoapi.com, giving external source. However, it does not mention potential latency, rate limits, or error conditions due to external API calls.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that fully conveys the tool's purpose with no extraneous words. It is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the purpose is clear, the description does not mention the return value or output format. With no output schema, the agent cannot infer whether the tool returns a boolean, string, or detailed result. This lack of completeness is a gap for a simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with a clear description for the 'ip' parameter ('The IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate'). The description adds no additional detail beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool checks whether an IP address is a genuine CommonCrawl CCBot IP, specifying both IPv4 and IPv6 support. It is specific about the resource (CommonCrawl CCBot) and verb (check/validate), leaving no ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for verifying CommonCrawl CCBot IPs but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Since no sibling tools exist, the lack of alternatives is acceptable, but no 'when-to-use' context is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources