Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Validate ClaudeBot and Claude-SearchBot IP addresses. Remote MCP validate_ip tool.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsB

Average 3.3/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion with other tools. Each call targets a single, clear purpose.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, naming consistency is not an issue. The verb_noun pattern (validate_ip) is clear and follows common conventions.

Tool Count3/5

The server contains only one tool, which is appropriate for a very narrow utility but feels thin for a server named broadly 'claude'. For its focused purpose, it is acceptable.

Completeness5/5

The tool fully covers the declared domain of verifying ClaudeBot IP addresses. No additional operations (e.g., listing IP ranges) are implied, so the surface is complete for its stated scope.

Available Tools

1 tool
validate_ipValidate Anthropic ClaudeBot IPBInspect

Check whether an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine Anthropic ClaudeBot IP address, verified against Anthropic ClaudeBot's published IP data on seoapi.com.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ipYesThe IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description lacks details on behavior: e.g., whether it makes an external API call, processing time, or what happens if the IP is invalid. It only mentions verification against published data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, clear sentence with no wasted words. Efficiently communicates the tool's purpose and verification source.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate but missing details about return value or error handling. Could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'ip', so the description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('check'), the resource ('IP address'), and the verification method ('verified against Anthropic ClaudeBot's published IP data'). It distinguishes from any siblings (none).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool or alternatives. Even with no siblings, it could benefit from context like 'Use this to verify if an IP belongs to Anthropic's ClaudeBot.'

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources