Composite: audit a chain artifact (block topoheight, block hash, TX hash, and/or proof string) end-to-end. Returns a verdict (`cited_in_false_claim` | `clean`), the actual on-chain facts (block reward, TX acceptance status), an optional proof-string decode, a relayable narrative, and curated rebuttal docs citations.
When to call: when the user asks "what's going on with DERO block X?" / "is this transaction the inflation-claim TX?" / "does this proof string come from a known false claim?" PREFER this over chaining `dero_get_block_header_by_topo_height` + `dero_get_transaction` + `dero_decode_proof_string` yourself: the composite already runs them in parallel, joins them against the flagged false-claim registry, and emits a single `verdict` field plus a narrative so the agent does not need to compose the rebuttal arc from scratch each time.
Input Requirements (CRITICAL):
- At least ONE of `topoheight`, `block_hash`, `tx_hash`, or `proof_string` MUST be provided. The composite throws `INVALID_INPUT` otherwise.
- `topoheight` is OPTIONAL. Non-negative integer.
- `block_hash` is OPTIONAL. 64 hex characters.
- `tx_hash` is OPTIONAL. 64 hex characters.
- `proof_string` is OPTIONAL. Full `deroproof…` / DERO bech32 string with HRP.
- `include_forge_demo` is OPTIONAL (default false). When true AND `tx_hash` is provided, also forges a fresh demo proof for the same TX (via `dero_forge_demo_proof`) and embeds it under `forge_demo`. The demo amount auto-selects: a flagged artifact's pinned amount (e.g. -2.2M for the 2022 claim) > the cited `proof_string` V > -1 DERO. PREFER setting this true when the agent is fielding a "Verified ✓ means the chain minted coins, right?" question — the embedded forge IS the refutation.
Output: `{ verdict, inputs, matched_artifacts[], context_note, chain_facts, proof_decode, forge_demo, narrative, related_docs, _diagnostics }`. `verdict` is `cited_in_false_claim` when any input matches the flagged-artifact registry, else `clean`. `chain_facts` is null when no chain-querying input was provided or all daemon calls failed; `proof_decode` is null when no `proof_string` was provided. `forge_demo` is null unless `include_forge_demo: true` was passed; on success it carries `{ skipped: false, forged_proof_string, target_amount, ring_slot, ring_size, ring_receiver_address, math, self_check, explorer_display_amount, demo_amount_source }` (the slim form — full citations stay at the top level).
PREFER citing the returned `related_docs` verbatim in the agent response — they are the canonical rebuttal pages and have been validated against the bundled docs index by CI. Quote the `context_note` when verdict is `cited_in_false_claim` so the user understands why the artifact matters.
Connector