vm_list_snapshots

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint. Description adds value by stating no side effects, empty list behavior, and lack of pagination, complementing the annotations without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a clear summary line, bullet points for usage, and separate sections for args and returns. It is front-loaded with '[READ]' and every sentence adds value without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of an output schema, the description still details the return format (one dict per snapshot with name, description, created, state, level) and mentions no pagination. Sibling tools are numerous, but this tool's role is clearly isolated. The description is complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description thoroughly explains both parameters: vm_name as the exact VM name from vCenter inventory, and target as an optional vCenter/ESXi target from config.yaml, with a default behavior. This adds significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists the full snapshot tree of a VM, including nested children. It specifies it is read-only and distinguishes itself from sibling tools by being a prerequisite for revert, delete, and linked clone operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to call before vm_revert_snapshot, vm_delete_snapshot, or deploy_linked_clone. Also mentions it returns an empty list when no snapshots exist, providing clear context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.