cluster_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the critical condition of emptiness, beyond the annotations which already indicate destructive behavior. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, using a clear [WRITE] tag and structured Args format to convey essential information without waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

It adequately describes the precondition (empty cluster) and parameters, but could be improved by noting expected outputs or side effects given presence of output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description briefly explains both parameters (name and target) in the Args section, but with 0% schema coverage, more detail on constraints or formats would be beneficial.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Delete an empty cluster' with a specific condition 'no hosts must remain', distinguishing it from sibling tools like cluster_create or cluster_configure.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It specifies when to use the tool (cluster must be empty) but does not mention alternatives or what to do if hosts remain, e.g., use cluster_remove_host first.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.