Create warehouse

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations available, the description carries the burden of disclosure. It adds a key behavioral trait: the URL slug is auto-generated from the title and immutable. It also points to the operation schema for shape, but doesn't disclose return values or permission requirements, preventing a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the core action, and every sentence adds critical information: the action, the required field, the immutable slug behavior, and a pointer to the operation schema. No redundant words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has a nested object parameter, no output schema, and no annotations, the description covers the essential requirements and provides a critical behavioral warning. It also directs to get_operation_schema for exact shape, which compensates for the vague input schema. It could mention the return value, but the essential context is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although the schema already describes the warehouse parameter and the required title, the description adds the crucial detail that the slug is generated from the title and cannot be changed later. This goes beyond the schema and enriches the meaning of the title parameter, justifying a 4 over the baseline 3 for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a new warehouse, with a specific verb and resource. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like update_warehouse, get_warehouse, and list_warehouses.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides clear context for when to use (creating a warehouse), states the required title, and directs users to get_operation_schema for exact request shape. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it, so it lacks the strict 'when-not' guidance for a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.