Create category

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that it creates (mutates) a resource, but doesn't mention permissions, idempotency, side effects, or response format. The reference to get_operation_schema points to request shape, not behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three brief sentences, front-loaded with the purpose, then field requirements. No redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description gives clear field requirements and a pointer to get_operation_schema for the exact shape, but it doesn't describe the return value or any error scenarios. For a create operation with no output schema, this leaves some ambiguity about the response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema describes a single 'category' object. The description adds value by enumerating the optional fields (slug, parent_id, display_sequence, etc.) which are not specified in the schema property description beyond a reference to another schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a new product category, using the specific verb 'Create' and resource 'product category', distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_category and update_category. The action and scope are unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for use—creating a new category—and lists required vs optional fields. It doesn't explicitly name alternatives, but the verb 'Create' implies its use case vs update/get. No exclusions are given, so it's clear but not fully explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.