zia_get_network_app
Retrieve details of a single ZIA network application using its unique ID.
Instructions
Get a single ZIA network application by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| app_id | Yes |
Retrieve details of a single ZIA network application using its unique ID.
Get a single ZIA network application by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| app_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false. Description adds no additional behavioral context (e.g., error handling, rate limits, auth requirements).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence of 8 words, front-loaded with verb and resource. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, so return format is undescribed. However, for a single-object get operation and given sibling tools' patterns, the minimal description is acceptable but could benefit from stating what is returned.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema coverage, description states 'by ID' clarifying app_id is an identifier. However, no format or source guidance beyond that. Adequate for a single required parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the verb (Get), resource (ZIA network application), and means (by ID). Distinguishes from sibling tools like zia_list_network_apps which lists applications.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implicitly suggests use after listing to fetch a specific app by ID, but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. Siblings exist but no alternatives mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zscaler/zscaler-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server