zdx_get_software_details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description reinforces the read-only nature already declared in annotations (readOnlyHint=true), but provides no additional behavioral details such as what filters affect the result, any limitations on the software_key, or rate limits. Since annotations cover the primary behavioral aspect, the description adds minimal new info.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence with no unnecessary information. It is front-loaded and efficient, leaving space for schema and annotations to provide details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of a complete output schema, full parameter descriptions, and annotations, the description is adequate. It covers the essential purpose and safety, though it could optionally mention the filtering capabilities to enhance completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with each parameter having a description. The tool description does not add any additional semantics beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and resource 'details for specific ZDX software', with a read-only qualifier. It effectively communicates the tool's core function, though it could be more explicit in distinguishing from sibling tools like zdx_list_software by emphasizing single-instance retrieval.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., zdx_list_software for listing all software). There is no mention of prerequisites or context for using the optional filter parameters, leaving the agent to infer usage from the schema alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.