remove_country_region_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description mentions that an error is raised if settings cannot be removed, which is a behavioral trait. However, with no annotations provided, the description fails to disclose important details such as whether the operation is idempotent, what happens if settings do not exist, or any side effects on site configuration.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured with an Args section and a Raises section, which is concise. However, it is incomplete due to missing the 'self' parameter, and the content is very brief. It could be more informative without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (3 required parameters, nested object schema, output schema available) and the absence of annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the output, nor does it provide usage context relative to sibling tools. The missing parameter and minimal semantics further reduce completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description lists only two parameters (site_url and settings) but omits the 'self' parameter, which is required according to the input schema. The provided descriptions are minimal ('The URL of the site' and 'The country/region settings to remove') and do not clarify the structure or purpose of the complex 'settings' object. Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description fails to compensate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Remove country/region settings from a specific site,' which is a specific verb-resource combination. It distinguishes from sibling tools like add_country_region_settings and get_country_region_settings by indicating removal rather than addition or retrieval.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, such as requiring the settings to exist, or when not to use it. The brief description lacks context for decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.