Bing Webmaster Tools MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Bing Webmaster Tools MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that provides access to Bing Webmaster Tools functionality60317 npm25MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that integrates with Microsoft Bing Search API, allowing AI assistants to perform web, news, and image searches.380MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Bing Webmaster Tools, including site verification, URL submissions, traffic analytics, crawl monitoring, and keyword analysis through natural language.62MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides AI-grounded Bing search capabilities using the Azure AI Project Client. It enables intelligent web searches with automated citation tracking and URL extraction for seamless AI integration.-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI agents with access to Google Search Console data.25851 npm296MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Yandex Webmaster API, enabling natural-language queries about site indexing, search queries, IKS, diagnostics, sitemaps, and external links, as well as actions like recrawling, from AI assistants such as Claude, Cursor, and Codex.2099 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 62 tools
There are many near-identical analytics tools (get_query_stats, get_query_traffic_stats, get_query_page_stats, get_page_query_stats, get_page_stats, get_url_traffic_info) whose boundaries are subtle and likely to be confused. The CRUD groups are mostly clear, but the overlapping stats getters make tool selection hazardous.
Almost all tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_*, add_*, remove_*, submit_*). Minor inconsistencies like add_site_roles vs remove_site_role, get_query_page_stats vs get_page_query_stats, and get_deep_link_algo_urls keep it from being perfectly uniform.
62 tools is far too many for a coherent MCP surface, even for a broad API; many analytics getters could be consolidated. The count heavily outweighs the typical 3-15 well-scoped set and will impose a large selection burden on agents.
The tool surface covers most Webmaster Tools workflows: site verification, roles, feed/URL submission, crawl stats/issues, traffic stats, blocks, and settings. Minor gaps like no remove_connected_page and some deprecated deep-link endpoints prevent a perfect score.