enable_disable_query_parameter

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description should disclose behavioral traits like idempotency, side effects, or permission requirements. It only mentions that an error is raised if the update fails, leaving many behavioral aspects undocumented.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exceptionally concise, using a structured Args/Raises format. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy, and the key action is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of related sibling tools and the existence of an output schema, the description fails to contextualize when to use this tool (e.g., vs. add_query_parameter) and does not describe the return value. Behavioral completeness is low, especially with no annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description explains three of the four required parameters (site_url, query_parameter, is_enabled) with basic semantics. However, the `self` parameter is completely omitted, and details like the format of query_parameter (e.g., without '?') are missing. With 0% schema coverage, this partial explanation improves understanding but has notable gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (enable or disable) and the resource (a URL normalization parameter for a site). It distinguishes from siblings like add_query_parameter and remove_query_parameter by implying modification of an existing parameter's state.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as add_query_parameter or remove_query_parameter. It does not mention prerequisites (e.g., the parameter must already exist) or contextual conditions for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.