delete_spread
Delete a specific spread in an InDesign document by providing its index number.
Instructions
Delete a spread
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| spreadIndex | Yes | Spread index to delete |
Delete a specific spread in an InDesign document by providing its index number.
Delete a spread
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| spreadIndex | Yes | Spread index to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits, but it only states the action 'delete'. It does not mention side effects, such as whether deleting a spread also removes its contents or any constraints.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise, but lacks structure and substance. It could have included additional useful information without sacrificing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool name and sibling tools, the description is insufficient. It does not explain what a spread is or any prerequisites, making it inadequate for an agent to confidently invoke the tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a description for the single parameter. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema; it does not clarify indexing details like zero-based numbering or valid range.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a spread' is a tautology, merely restating the tool name. It does not specify what a spread is or how it differs from sibling tools like 'delete_master_spread' or 'delete_page'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'delete_page' or 'delete_master_spread'. The description lacks any contextual usage hints.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zhanglongxiao111/indesign-cli'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server