create_group
Group selected items on a specified page in an InDesign document.
Instructions
Create a group from currently selected items
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageIndex | Yes | Index of the page where the group will be created |
Group selected items on a specified page in an InDesign document.
Create a group from currently selected items
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageIndex | Yes | Index of the page where the group will be created |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It fails to mention that the group is created on a specified page (pageIndex parameter), what happens to selected items, or any side effects. This is insufficient transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (one sentence), which is good, but it sacrifices important details that could aid selection and invocation. Still, it is appropriately front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the one parameter and no output schema, the description should still explain core aspects like what 'currently selected items' means and the return behavior. It lacks these, making it incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already provides a description for the single parameter 'pageIndex' (100% coverage). The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond that, meeting the baseline but not exceeding it.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Create a group') and the scope ('from currently selected items'), but does not differentiate from the similar sibling 'create_group_from_items', which could cause confusion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'add_item_to_group' or 'create_group_from_items'. No prerequisites or usage context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zhanglongxiao111/indesign-cli'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server