create_document_section

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states 'create' without indicating whether the operation is destructive, what permissions are needed, or side effects (e.g., impact on existing sections). No behavioral traits beyond the verb are revealed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single clear sentence with no redundancy. It is front-loaded. However, it could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness, e.g., by mentioning the purpose of a section in document structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (4 parameters, required startPage, enum options) and absence of output schema, the description is insufficient. It does not explain what a 'section' is, how it interacts with the document, or what the tool returns. The agent lacks essential context for correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All four parameters are described in the input schema (100% coverage). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, matching the baseline. It does not elaborate on how parameters like 'numberingStyle' affect the section behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: creating a new section in the document. It uses a specific verb-resource pair ('create section') and is distinct from sibling tools like 'create_document' or 'create_layer'. However, it could further clarify what a 'section' entails (e.g., page numbering, prefix, style).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., modifying existing sections via other tools, or using page properties). The description lacks context for when this tool is appropriate, leaving the agent without decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.