Skip to main content
Glama
zesun33

mcp-gds

by zesun33
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-gds

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • jlceda-ai-agent

      jiangyiqi99
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate 嘉立创 EDA Professional through MCP, including schematic and PCB editing, component search and placement, net routing, DRC, and design capture.
      -

    • sentaurus-mcp

      HanKin666
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Sentaurus TCAD simulation experiments via MCP, including creating and submitting jobs, querying status, reading logs, and listing output files.
      6
      6
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-verilog

      zesun33
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and IDEs to lint, compile, syntax-check, and simulate Verilog/SystemVerilog designs through structured, token-efficient MCP tools with isolated containerized toolchains.
      4
      17 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • CDT-KiCAD

      SlncTrZ
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to drive KiCAD PCB design automation through MCP, covering schematic authoring, board and routing operations, footprint/symbol libraries, vendor PCB import, validation and DRC, and manufacturing export. It exposes 236 registered tools with keyword discovery, dynamic project-state resources, and optional Streamable HTTP transport with fail-closed Bearer authentication.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: metadata reading, DEF-to-GDS conversion, DRC, LVS, extraction, and version info. No overlapping or ambiguous responsibilities.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names generally follow a predictable pattern, but mix domain-first (gds_info, gds_stream_out) with verb-first (extract_magic) and tool-specific suffixes (drc_klayout, lvs_netgen). Slightly inconsistent but still mostly intuitive.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools cover the essential operations for a layout-to-signoff verification workflow without redundancy or overload. The count feels well-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the main EDA flow steps (metadata, conversion, DRC, LVS, extraction, environment info). Minor gaps like a dedicated netlist viewer or layout manipulation tool could be added, but the core cycle is complete.

    Resources