browser_hover
Simulate mouse hover over a web element using its reference, enabling interaction with hover-triggered UI components.
Instructions
Hover over a web page element.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ref | Yes | ||
| element | No |
Simulate mouse hover over a web element using its reference, enabling interaction with hover-triggered UI components.
Hover over a web page element.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ref | Yes | ||
| element | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only states the action with no detail on cursor movement, event triggering, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single terse sentence that omits essential operational details, making it under-specified rather than appropriately concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no annotations, no output schema, and two parameters left unexplained, the description covers only the basic purpose and leaves the agent without sufficient context for correct invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 0% description coverage, and the description does not explain the 'ref' or 'element' parameters or how they relate to the hover target.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states a specific action and target ('Hover over a web page element'), which distinguishes it from sibling actions like click or drag. However, it lacks explicit differentiation from other browser tools, so it does not fully meet the 'distinguishes from siblings' criterion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use hover versus click or other interactions. No alternatives or contextual triggers are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zc-libre/camoufox-mcp-python'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server