Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to medrxiv-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      🔍 Enable AI assistants to search and access medRxiv papers through a simple MCP interface. The medRxiv MCP Server provides a bridge between AI assistants and medRxiv's preprint repository through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). It allows AI models to search for health sciences preprints and acce
      9
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server that searches multiple scholarly metadata providers (PubMed, Europe PMC, bioRxiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, arXiv), deduplicates results, and returns ranked literature with optional open-access full-text retrieval from Europe PMC.
      3
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      🔍 Enable AI assistants to search and access bioRxiv papers through a simple MCP interface. The bioRxiv MCP Server provides a bridge between AI assistants and bioRxiv's preprint repository through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). It allows AI models to search for biology preprints and access their
      25
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for searching scientific papers, retrieving metadata and abstracts, and legally downloading Open Access PDFs via OpenAlex, CrossRef, and Unpaywall APIs.
      5
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one searches for preprints by keyword, the other fetches the full text of a specific preprint by DOI. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the verb_noun pattern consistently: 'search_preprints' and 'fetch_fulltext'. The naming is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels minimal but covers the essential use case of finding and reading preprints. However, it is borderline thin and could benefit from additional tools for filtering or listing.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers the core workflow—search and fetch—but lacks features like filtering by date, author, or category, or listing recent preprints. Minor gaps exist that agents can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues