medrxiv-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to medrxiv-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenance🔍 Enable AI assistants to search and access medRxiv papers through a simple MCP interface. The medRxiv MCP Server provides a bridge between AI assistants and medRxiv's preprint repository through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). It allows AI models to search for health sciences preprints and acce9-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA standalone MCP server that searches multiple scholarly metadata providers (PubMed, Europe PMC, bioRxiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, arXiv), deduplicates results, and returns ranked literature with optional open-access full-text retrieval from Europe PMC.31Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenance🔍 Enable AI assistants to search and access bioRxiv papers through a simple MCP interface. The bioRxiv MCP Server provides a bridge between AI assistants and bioRxiv's preprint repository through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). It allows AI models to search for biology preprints and access their25-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that turns DOI, URL, or paper titles into structured Markdown full-text with metadata and assets, enabling AI agents to read beyond abstracts.9242MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSearch and retrieve bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints — by DOI, date interval, or keyword — via MCP.1354Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA local MCP server for searching scientific papers, retrieving metadata and abstracts, and legally downloading Open Access PDFs via OpenAlex, CrossRef, and Unpaywall APIs.53MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one searches for preprints by keyword, the other fetches the full text of a specific preprint by DOI. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
Both tools follow the verb_noun pattern consistently: 'search_preprints' and 'fetch_fulltext'. The naming is clear and predictable.
With only two tools, the server feels minimal but covers the essential use case of finding and reading preprints. However, it is borderline thin and could benefit from additional tools for filtering or listing.
The tool surface covers the core workflow—search and fetch—but lacks features like filtering by date, author, or category, or listing recent preprints. Minor gaps exist that agents can work around.