dingtalk_calendar_event_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description alone is responsible for disclosing behavioral traits. It only says 'create new calendar event' with no mention of side effects, permissions, idempotency, or return behavior. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short phrase, which is concise, but it is also under-specified. It lacks front-loaded details that would help the agent understand usage, so it is not as effective as it could be while still being brief.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, annotations, and any extra context, the description does not fully explain the tool's behavior. It covers the basic action but omits critical details like date/time format specifics, default values, error conditions, or call outcomes, making it incomplete for a create operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with all five parameters described (title, start/end times, attendees, description). The description adds no additional parameter meaning, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate since the schema already handles parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '创建新日程' clearly states the action (create) and resource (calendar event), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like update, delete, get, and list. It lacks additional scope details but is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention exclusions, prerequisites, or comparisons with related calendar tools such as dingtalk_calendar_event_update or dingtalk_calendar_event_suggest.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.