Get XDaLa session transactions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It correctly indicates it is a read operation (list, returns) and does not mention destructive actions or special permissions. However, it lacks details on rate limits, authentication needs, or response size constraints. Basic transparency is achieved but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the main purpose, and includes a negative statement to clarify scope. Every sentence contributes meaning; no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description covers what is returned (timeline of hashes, blocks, fees, steps). It omits how pagination works (page/limit params exist) and ordering. The context is fairly complete for a list operation, but the pagination behavior would help the agent use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description should explain parameters. It does not mention sessionId, owner, page, or limit at all. The parameter names are somewhat self-explanatory (e.g., sessionId, owner), but page and limit lack context such as default values or pagination behavior. The description adds no value over the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'list' and the resource 'blockchain transactions belonging to an XDaLa session'. It specifies the returned data (timeline of transaction hashes, blocks, fees, iteration steps) and explicitly differentiates from tools that return full engine payloads or contract read results, thus distinguishing from siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when one needs the transaction timeline of a session and excludes returns like full payloads, which hints at alternatives but does not explicitly name them or state when not to use this tool. Guidance is adequate but not robust.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.