Get recent XDaLa sessions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It states the tool accesses a 'read-only Explorer database', implying safety. It adds context about payload enrichment and optional filtering, but does not detail return structure or pagination beyond listing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, dense sentence that packs in the core purpose, use case, and parameter options without any filler. Every part contributes to understanding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the tool's purpose and parameters well, but lacks details on return structure (no output schema) and ordering (implied recent but not stated). With 4 optional parameters, it is adequate but could be more complete regarding output format.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description enumerates the four parameters ('owner filtering, time windows, result limits and payload enrichment'), directly mapping to owner, windowHours, limit, and includePayload. The schema itself only provides constraints, so the description adds meaningful purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists recent indexed XDaLa sessions, specifying it is for when the user does not know owner or sessionId. It distinguishes from siblings like list_xdala_sessions by mentioning the read-only Explorer database and enumerating supported filtering options.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear use case ('especially when the user does not know owner and sessionId') and lists supported filters. It does not explicitly mention when not to use or compare to alternatives, but the context is clear enough for an agent to decide.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.