Estimate XDaLa rule gas

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description explains what the tool returns (validation gas, branch gas, etc.) and that it calls xgr_estimateRuleGas, but does not state whether the operation is read-only or has side effects. Given no annotations, the description provides moderate transparency for a non-mutating estimation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only two sentences, the first states the purpose and the second lists return values. It is highly concise and front-loaded, with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite a clear purpose and return breakdown, the description omits any explanation of parameters, which is critical given 4 parameters with zero schema descriptions. It also does not address prerequisites or behavior. The tool has no output schema, so the return description is helpful but incomplete overall.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 4 parameters with 0% description coverage. The description does not mention any parameters or their meanings, failing to add value beyond the bare schema. This leaves agents with no guidance on how to use 'json', 'encrypted', 'validSpawns', or 'invalidSpawns'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool estimates XDaLa/XRC-137 rule gas and lists specific return metrics (validation gas, branch gas, grant fees, worst-case totals). It distinguishes from sibling estimation tools by specifying 'rule gas' as the resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description instructs 'Use this to estimate XDaLa/XRC-137 rule gas', implying the tool is for rule gas estimation tasks. However, it does not provide explicit guidance on when not to use or mention alternatives, leaving the agent to infer from context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.