cn402_iching_full

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description lacks any behavioral details such as read-only nature, security considerations, or side effects. Only mentions price, which is not a behavioral trait. For a tool with no annotations, transparency is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is front-loaded with key purpose and components. Includes Chinese translation and price info which, while not strictly functional, does not detract. Slightly verbose but well-organized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given single parameter and no output schema, description adequately lists all output components. Agent can understand what the tool returns without ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema fully describes the single parameter (hexagram number 1-64). Description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it provides a complete I Ching analysis with exhaustive list of components (hexagram, line texts, nuclear/inverse/opposite hexagrams, trigrams, judgment, image). Distinguishes from sibling tools like cn402_iching_hexagram by emphasizing 'full' and 'single-call'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies use when a comprehensive, all-in-one reading is needed. Does not explicitly exclude specific use cases or name alternatives, but the context of 'complete' vs smaller tools is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.