cn402_bazi_wuxing

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It only describes the function (scoring elements) but does not disclose side effects, authentication requirements, rate limits, or whether the operation is read-only. The price note is non-behavioral. This leaves the agent with little insight into how the tool behaves beyond its core function.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is moderately concise but includes a long list of redundant keywords and a price note that does not aid tool selection. It is front-loaded with synonyms, but the actual functional description is clear. Some trimming could improve conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of Ba Zi wuxing analysis, the description adequately explains the output (scoring and highlighting strong/weak elements). No output schema is provided, so the description effectively communicates what the agent can expect. A bit more detail on the output format would be beneficial, but it is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully covers the single parameter 'datetime' with a clear description. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so it meets the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool analyzes the five elements (wuxing) from a birth chart and scores each element's strength. It uses multiple synonyms and keywords, making the purpose unmistakable. Among sibling tools, this one is distinct by focusing specifically on wuxing analysis.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used for analyzing element distribution from a birth datetime, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus other Ba Zi tools, nor does it mention when not to use it. Context hints at usage within Chinese cosmology, but guidance is minimal.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.