baidu_translate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description includes pricing info and free usage limit, which are behavioral traits. However, it doesn't disclose supported languages, language code format, or error behaviors. With no annotations, the description partially covers behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise, with purpose front-loaded in brackets. However, it could include more context without being lengthy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Missing crucial details like supported language codes, how to specify languages, and response format. As a translation tool with 3 parameters and no output schema, more context is needed for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%; the description adds no extra meaning beyond the parameter names and brief schema descriptions. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it's a translation tool (多语种翻译) and includes pricing. The title and description distinguish it from sibling Baidu tools which are other services like OCR, image analysis, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage: use for translation. No explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives (e.g., other translation tools), nor when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.