baidu_body_analysis
Detect key points on a human body from an image URL, including joints and facial landmarks.
Instructions
[Body] 人体关键点检测 — $0.02/call (free: 5/5 today)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| image | Yes | 人体图片URL |
Detect key points on a human body from an image URL, including joints and facial landmarks.
[Body] 人体关键点检测 — $0.02/call (free: 5/5 today)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| image | Yes | 人体图片URL |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It reveals pricing and free quota but fails to disclose side effects, data handling, read-only nature, or return behavior. Inadequate for a detection tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very concise, one sentence plus pricing. However, it mixes purpose and pricing info without clear structure. Could be more formal but still acceptable for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Does not describe the output format, keypoint details, or any response structure. Given no output schema, the agent is left uninformed about what to expect after calling the tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already describes the image parameter with 100% coverage. The description adds no extra semantics beyond the schema's '人体图片URL' description, so baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool detects human body keypoints, distinguishing it from sibling tools for face, gesture, animal, etc. The verb 'detect' and resource 'body keypoints' are specific.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like baidu_gesture or baidu_face_detect. The description only provides functionality and pricing, leaving the agent to infer usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wuzenghai616-lang/goldbean'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server