baidu_ocr_accurate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description adds cost and free quota info but lacks details on input validation, error handling, performance, or supported languages. It partially covers behavioral aspects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient line with key info front-loaded: [OCR] and version. No wasted words, but could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 1 param and no output schema, the description should hint at return values or capabilities. It only mentions cost and version, missing crucial context like output format or success/failure behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the sole parameter 'image' having a description '图片URL'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, such as format or size limits. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it's for OCR text recognition with high accuracy, including cost and free quota. However, it does not differentiate from sibling OCR tools like baidu_ocr (standard) or baidu_ocr_handwriting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description mentions 'high precision' but does not explicitly state use cases, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.