screening_get_all_screening_recommendations

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden. It states it returns top stocks organized by strategy, but does not disclose data freshness, permissions, rate limits, or potential side effects. Adequate but could be more comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is concise and front-loaded with purpose. Uses bullet points to list strategies clearly. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no parameters and an output schema existing, the description adequately covers what the tool does and its return structure. Missing details like ordering or limits, but still fairly complete for a simple list retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, baseline 4 per guidelines. Description adds nothing about parameters, but none are needed. Schema coverage is 100%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns comprehensive screening results from all strategies, listing three specific strategies (Maverick Bullish, Maverick Bearish, Supply/Demand Breakouts). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like screening_get_maverick_stocks that return only one strategy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when you need all strategies at once, but does not explicitly state when to use this vs alternative specific tools. No direct 'when-not-to-use' or mention of alternatives, but context from the list makes it clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.