Skip to main content
Glama
wshobson

MaverickMCP

by wshobson

Related Servers

Alternatives to MaverickMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive stock market data and technical analysis tools via the MCP protocol, enabling real-time quotes, historical data, and professional indicators like RSI and MACD for Claude Desktop and other clients.
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for stock prices, historical data, FX rates, and ticker search, powered by yfinance with no API key required. Designed for Claude Desktop.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides real-time stock quotes and company summaries using the Alpha Vantage API. It enables natural language financial data queries in Claude Desktop and other MCP clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for stock analysis and trading insights, including stock screening, fundamental analysis, insider trading, options analysis, social media research, and news analysis.
      10
      75
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Institutional Financial Intelligence MCP Server for Claude Desktop & AI Agents. Sub-second market data, technical indicators, SEC EDGAR 10-K parsing, and local SQLite backtesting.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides real-time stock market data for Claude Desktop and MCP-compatible clients, enabling natural language queries for quotes, historical prices, company profiles, financial statements, analyst ratings, comparisons, news, options, holdings, dividends, estimates, symbol search, and market status.
      210 npm
      21
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 119 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    Numerous tools share identical or near-identical purposes (e.g., get_maverick_stocks vs screening_get_maverick_stocks, get_my_portfolio vs portfolio_get_my_portfolio, fetch_stock_data vs data_fetch_stock_data). An agent cannot reliably distinguish between duplicates, leading to high misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming conventions are mixed: some tools use domain prefixes (technical_, screening_, portfolio_), others do not (get_rsi_analysis, run_backtest). Even within the same domain, prefixes vary (get_system_health vs performance_get_system_performance_health). Verbs and noun structures are inconsistent.

    Tool Count1/5

    119 tools is far beyond what is needed for a stock analysis server. The excessive count is inflated by many redundant or overlapping tools, making the surface bloated and unwieldy rather than well-scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    Despite numerous duplicates, the server covers many core domains (screening, portfolio management, backtesting, technical analysis, watchlists, journaling, risk). However, some obvious CRUD operations are missing (e.g., delete watchlist, update journal trade), and the massive duplication suggests incoherent design rather than complete coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week