delete_signal

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description implies a destructive action ('delete') but lacks details on side effects, permissions, or permanence. With no annotations, the description should bear the burden of transparency; it does the minimum by stating the action but omits behavioral specifics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no excess words. It conveys the essential information efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has only one parameter and an output schema (not shown), the description is fairly complete. It covers the action and the required input. However, it could mention return value confirmation or note that deletion is irreversible.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter signal_id is mentioned as 'by ID' in the description, which clarifies its purpose. However, schema description coverage is 0%, so the description adds only marginal meaning. The integer type is self-explanatory, but no format or context (e.g., where to get the ID) is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (delete) and the specific resource (signal alert) with a clear identifier (by ID). It is specific enough to understand the tool's function, though it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like update_signal or create_signal.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, best practices, or when not to use it. The sibling list contains many related tools, but the description offers no comparative context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.