timeweb_list_k8s_clusters

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavior. It only states the basic action; it does not mention pagination (despite offset/limit parameters), potential large result sets, or that it is a read-only operation. The description offers minimal insight beyond the tool's name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that is front-loaded with the verb and object. There is no redundant information or unnecessary wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a straightforward list operation, the description is adequate. The schema covers all parameters, and there is no output schema, so the description need not explain return details. However, it could have mentioned pagination or default behavior to be fully complete, making it slightly short of a perfect score.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for all three parameters (limit, format, offset), so the schema already fully documents parameter usage. The description adds no additional parameter context, meeting the baseline but not exceeding it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action ('List') and specific resource ('Kubernetes clusters') with scope ('in the account'). It is unambiguous and naturally distinguishes from sibling tools like get_k8s_cluster (single cluster) and list_k8s_versions (versions).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for listing all clusters but provides no explicit guidance on when to choose this over related tools such as get_k8s_cluster. There are no exclusions or alternative mentions, so it relies on the user to infer context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.