timeweb_create_floating_ip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states that a new IP is created, without revealing whether the operation is synchronous, what the response contains, whether it requires specific permissions, or the impact of the optional parameters like is_ddos_guard or availability_zone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that immediately communicates the core function. There is no redundant or extraneous text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is relatively simple with four optional parameters documented in the schema. However, without an output schema, the description does not explain what the create operation returns (e.g., the new IP object). This lack of return-value context and any side-effect information makes the description only average for completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides complete descriptions for all four parameters (format, comment, is_ddos_guard, availability_zone), achieving 100% coverage. The description adds no additional parameter meaning, but per guidelines, baseline 3 applies when schema coverage is high.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a new floating IP address' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools that list, get, delete, bind, or unbind floating IPs. It is unambiguous about the action performed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or how it relates to bind/unbind operations. The description simply states the action without contextual direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.