timeweb_create_k8s_cluster

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It implies mutation via 'Create' but provides no information about costs, permissions, idempotency, or potential side effects. This is a significant gap for a create operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise and front-loaded. However, it is under-specified and adds little value beyond restating the tool name. It earns its place as a minimal purpose statement but does not provide useful additional information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (8 parameters, 2 required, no output schema, no annotations) a one-sentence description is insufficient. It does not mention important context such as billing implications, cluster provisioning time, or relationship to worker groups and presets. The schema covers parameter definitions, but the description lacks operational context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers all 8 parameters with descriptions, so the baseline is 3. The description itself adds no parameter meaning beyond what the schema already provides. The schema's 100% coverage compensates for the description's silence.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Create a new Kubernetes cluster' which is a specific verb+resource and clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like timeweb_list_k8s_clusters and timeweb_delete_k8s_cluster. However, it lacks any additional scope or context, making it clear but not exceptional.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no mention of prerequisites, or any exclusions. The description merely says 'Create a new Kubernetes cluster' without any usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.