update_app_review

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the need for the full settings object (implying replacement) and the subscription id prerequisite. But it does not explicitly state whether the update replaces or merges settings, nor any side effects or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: first declares purpose, second gives required inputs. No filler, front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 2-param tool with no output schema, the description covers purpose and key input requirements. It tells the user how to get the id and what to pass. However, it leaves some ambiguity about the update semantics (replace vs merge) and response details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters. The description adds the 'full settings object' guidance and examples, but this is marginal beyond the schema's own examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates the product-review app's settings, with specific examples (shop_info, auto-approve, display options). It differentiates from the sibling 'update_app' by specifying 'product-review app'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides clear context: use to update settings for the product-review app, and instructs to pass the subscription id from get_app and the full settings object. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions, leaving some room for ambiguity with update_app.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.