delete_article
Delete a blog article using its ID to remove it from your storefront.
Instructions
Delete a blog article
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Article ID |
Delete a blog article using its ID to remove it from your storefront.
Delete a blog article
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Article ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, but it only states the action 'Delete' without indicating permanence, side effects, required permissions, or any other consequences. For a destructive operation, this is a significant gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence that is extremely concise and front-loaded. It contains no fluff or unnecessary words, making it efficiently scannable for an agent.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema, but it is a destructive operation. The description omits any mention of permanence, whether it can be undone, effects on related data, or success/failure outcomes, leaving the context incomplete for an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema fully describes the only parameter 'id' with 'Article ID' (100% coverage). The description adds no additional parameter semantics, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate given the schema's completeness.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Delete' and resource 'blog article', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like delete_page and delete_product. It adds the modifier 'blog' which provides refinement beyond the tool name alone.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any conditions, prerequisites, or warnings. The description is purely a statement of function with no usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/vuluu2k/webcake-storefront-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server