Подписки (административный обзор)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It indicates a listing operation, which is read-like, but does not explain what 'extended' means, what data is returned, whether admin privileges are required, or how this list differs behaviorally from the standard subscription list.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, compact sentence with no filler words. It front-loads the main purpose ('extended list of subscriptions') before the access context. It is concise, though very sparse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with only two optional pagination parameters and a clearly documented schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, the term 'extended' is vague, there is no output schema, and no information about return shape or admin requirements, leaving gaps for an agent deciding whether this tool meets its need.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents both parameters (skipCount and maxResultCount) with descriptions and constraints, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds nothing about pagination behavior or parameter usage, which keeps this at the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific resource ('subscriptions') and an action ('list'), and adds a distinguishing context: it is an 'extended list' available from the administrative section. It does not explicitly name a sibling like wata_subscriptions_list, so the differentiation is clear but not fully explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'available from the administrative section' implies this tool is for admin-side views, but the description gives no explicit when-to-use guidance, no exclusions, and no reference to alternative tools such as wata_subscriptions_list or wata_subscriptions_counts. An agent would have to infer the intended use case.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.