wrap_with_output

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior. It says it wraps a cell with VoseOutput, implying modification, but doesn't mention side effects, required state (e.g., workbook open, cell must contain an existing output?), or the effect of dry_run. Very sparse.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words. However, it is too brief for a tool with 5 parameters and no annotations; could benefit from a second sentence summarizing parameter roles or usage flow.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Missing prerequisites (e.g., workbook state, cell content requirements) and integration hints with sibling tools. Output schema exists, so return values are covered, but setup and post-conditions are absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage. Description only indirectly references 'name' and assumes cell/sheet/workbook context. Does not explain the 'dry_run' parameter (with default true), which is critical for execution. Many parameters undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Describes a specific verb ('wrap') and resource ('existing output cell'), and clearly states the outcome: it makes the cell appear in the output list and Results Viewer. Differentiates from the sibling wrap_with_input by targeting outputs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other output-related tools like list_modelrisk_outputs or get_cell). No exclusions or prerequisites mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.