Skip to main content
Glama
vosesoftware

ModelRisk MCP

Official
by vosesoftware
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ModelRisk MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • excel-mcp-server

      yaoyuansh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to automate Microsoft Excel tasks such as reading/writing cells, formatting, creating charts, and managing sheets through natural language using the Model Context Protocol.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • QuantAnalyticsMCP

      sathanandhh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides quantitative analytics and statistical inference for financial data, including Monte Carlo DCF valuation, risk metrics, and trend regression diagnostics, enabling natural language-driven financial analysis via Claude Desktop.
      MIT

    • xlsx-audit-mcp

      arose26
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Audits Excel workbooks by tracing cell dependencies and detecting circular references, volatile functions, and other formula risks, enabling natural-language audit queries on local files.
      4
      21 npm
      MIT

    • Excel MCP Server

      kousunh
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform comprehensive Microsoft Excel operations including data analysis, cell editing, advanced formatting, and VBA execution on Windows systems. It provides a structured workflow for managing workbooks and worksheets through a dedicated Model Context Protocol interface.
      5
      81 npm
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 59 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tool clusters overlap heavily: discover_inputs and find_hard_coded_inputs both hunt for candidate uncertain inputs, get_correlation_matrix vs compute_correlation_matrix vs fit_copula_to_data all involve correlation from different sources, and the report/chart tools blur together. Individual descriptions are helpful, but the sheer number of near-duplicate convenience wrappers makes misselection likely.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern, which is broadly predictable. However, retrieval verbs are inconsistent — list, get, read, compute — and there are awkward variants like create_aggregate_mc, wrap_with_input, and fit_all_data_and_wire that break the clean pattern.

    Tool Count1/5

    59 tools is far beyond the 16-25 heavy threshold and squarely in the 50+ extreme range. While the domain is broad, many tools are convenience wrappers or one-shot summaries that could be merged or expressed as parameters of a smaller set.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface is remarkably complete for Monte Carlo risk modeling: workbook lifecycle, cell reading/writing, distribution fitting, simulation, results analysis, tail risk, copulas, time series, auditing, charting, and rollback are all covered. There are no obvious dead ends — the high-level build and plan tools tie the lower-level operations together.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources