list_checkout_sessions
Retrieve recent Checkout sessions. Control how many sessions to return, up to 100.
Instructions
Lists recent Checkout sessions.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | Yes | Number of sessions to return (max 100). |
Retrieve recent Checkout sessions. Control how many sessions to return, up to 100.
Lists recent Checkout sessions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | Yes | Number of sessions to return (max 100). |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=true, consistent with 'lists'. Description does not add further behavioral context like ordering, pagination, or permissions needed. With annotations covering safety, a score of 3 is appropriate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence with no unnecessary words. Highly concise and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity and no output schema, the description omits useful details like what fields are returned, ordering (e.g., by creation date), and whether the response includes full session objects. It is incomplete for a list endpoint.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameter 'limit' is already well-documented. The tool description does not add additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Lists' and the resource 'Checkout sessions', with a temporal qualifier 'recent'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_checkout_session' but could be more specific about recency criteria.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'list_invoices' or other list tools. No when-to-use or when-not-to-use context is provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/vineethkrishnan/mcp-pool'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server