get_product
Retrieve detailed information about a Stripe product using its unique ID.
Instructions
Retrieves details of a specific Stripe product.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the product (e.g., 'prod_123'). |
Retrieve detailed information about a Stripe product using its unique ID.
Retrieves details of a specific Stripe product.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the product (e.g., 'prod_123'). |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true, and the description aligns by stating 'retrieves'. However, no additional behavioral details are provided beyond what annotations already cover.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that is concise and front-loaded, with no unnecessary information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description does not mention the return format or what details are retrieved. For a simple retrieval tool, it is adequate but could be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 100% schema description coverage, the description does not add meaning beyond the parameter description in the schema. The baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'retrieves' and the resource 'details of a specific Stripe product'. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like list_products and other get_* tools by specifying 'specific' product.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_products. The usage is implied but not clearly stated, missing an opportunity to direct the agent.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/vineethkrishnan/mcp-pool'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server