Skip to main content
Glama
vantagemcp

vantage-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to vantage-mcp

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Audit your brand's visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI - get citation rates, AEO health scores, content gap analysis, and a 9-page content suite to rank in AI-generated answers.
    5
    70 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables users to interrogate ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini with buyer questions and live web search to learn whether a business is recommended, ranked, competing with others, and having its website cited. Returns structured findings and estimated provider costs.
    1
    336 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables auditing AI search visibility: checks site readiness for AI crawlers and measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend your site, including verbatim answers and citation gap analysis.
    97 npm
    4
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to monitor and analyze a brand's visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, providing insights, recommendations, and competitive analysis without switching tabs.
    25
    19 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to check brand mentions across AI search surfaces like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews using natural language queries.
    4
    3 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables brand visibility monitoring across major AI platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. It allows users to track visibility scores, analyze competitor data, and receive actionable insights to improve AI-generated brand recommendations.
    16
    11 npm
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Scored across 9 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference related tools to guide selection. Overlaps such as find_citation_leaders vs. find_cited_questions and analyze_citation_structure vs. analyze_citation_gap are well differentiated by starting point and output.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names use consistent snake_case with a predictable verb_noun or verb_noun_qualifier pattern, e.g. find_citation_leaders, analyze_citation_structure, check_prompt_coverage. The batch variant is clearly named as a suffix, which maintains readability and consistency.

Tool Count5/5

Nine tools is well scoped for an AI citation analytics server, with separate tools for discovery, auditing, diagnosis, tracking, and usage. No tool feels redundant or trivial, and the batch forms are justified by cost/scale concerns.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the core lifecycle: quota checks, leaderboard discovery, cited-question discovery, domain trend tracking, prompt coverage auditing, answer-structure analysis, gap analysis, and history. Minor gaps remain, such as no batch form for analyze_citation_gap or analyze_citation_trend, but agents can work around these one keyword at a time.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues