Skip to main content
Glama
vantagemcp

vantage-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to vantage-mcp

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Audit your brand's visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI - get citation rates, AEO health scores, content gap analysis, and a 9-page content suite to rank in AI-generated answers.
    5
    973 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables users to interrogate ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini with buyer questions and live web search to learn whether a business is recommended, ranked, competing with others, and having its website cited. Returns structured findings and estimated provider costs.
    1
    99 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables users to check any public website's AI crawler access, GEO readiness, and latest public brand mention and citation reports in ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables auditing and monitoring brand visibility, citations, and competitor share-of-voice across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek from MCP-compatible clients such as Cursor and Claude Desktop.
    2 npm
    35
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables auditing AI search visibility: checks site readiness for AI crawlers and measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend your site, including verbatim answers and citation gap analysis.
    79 npm
    4
    AGPL 3.0

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 10 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Tools mostly target distinct operations: 'leaders' (keyword→top domains from the tracked corpus), 'questions' (domain→questions from the same corpus), 'trend' (domain over time), 'structure' (shape of one live answer), 'coverage' (does a domain get cited across keywords), and 'gap' (fix brief). The citation_* family is close cousin territory — structure, structure_batch, coverage, and gap all take keyword+engine and return source_domains/source_mix — but the descriptions repeatedly spell out the tracked-corpus-vs-live-answer distinction and the 'use this to answer X' framing to keep them separable.

Naming Consistency5/5

All ten names are lowercase snake_case following a verb_noun pattern (find_*, analyze_*, get_*). Variants inside a family are suffixed predictably (analyze_citation_structure vs analyze_citation_structure_batch), and the meta tools (get_usage, get_supported_options, get_check_history) are consistently get_-prefixed.

Tool Count5/5

Ten tools is well within the sweet spot for a focused analytics domain. Each earns its place: six analysis tools cover the core surface and three zero-cost meta tools (options, usage, history) support quota-aware operation without bloating the set.

Completeness5/5

The surface covers a full workflow: keyword discovery (find_cited_questions), leader/competitor ranking (find_citation_leaders), visibility checking (analyze_citation_coverage), diagnosis and remediation (analyze_citation_structure, _batch, analyze_citation_gap), trend tracking (analyze_citation_trend), plus meta support (get_usage, get_supported_options, get_check_history). No obvious dead ends for the stated AI-citation-visibility purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive