Skip to main content
Glama
vantagemcp

vantage-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to vantage-mcp

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Audit your brand's visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI - get citation rates, AEO health scores, content gap analysis, and a 9-page content suite to rank in AI-generated answers.
    5
    98 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables auditing AI search visibility: checks site readiness for AI crawlers and measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend your site, including verbatim answers and citation gap analysis.
    89 npm
    4
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to monitor and analyze a brand's visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, providing insights, recommendations, and competitive analysis without switching tabs.
    25
    15 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to check brand mentions across AI search surfaces like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews using natural language queries.
    4
    3 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables brand visibility monitoring across major AI platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. It allows users to track visibility scores, analyze competitor data, and receive actionable insights to improve AI-generated brand recommendations.
    16
    7 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to scan brand visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Perplexity, analyze website GEO readiness, compare competitors, and get actionable recommendations.
    MIT

TDQS

A4.9/5.0

Scored across 9 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a clearly distinct step in the citation-audit workflow: single vs batch structure analysis, domain coverage, gap analysis, leaders, cited questions, trends, history, and quota. Near-overlaps like structure vs gap or coverage vs leaders are explicitly cross-referenced in the descriptions, so an agent can reliably disambiguate them.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern using the verbs analyze, check, find, and get. The only variation is the systematic _batch suffix, which clearly marks the batching variant of analyze_citation_structure.

Tool Count5/5

Nine tools is well within the well-scoped range for this server's purpose. Each tool earns its place, including the two zero-cost meta tools (get_usage and get_check_history) that support the metered workflow without adding noise.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full read-only citation-audit lifecycle: discovery (find_citation_leaders, find_cited_questions), coverage (check_prompt_coverage), structure (analyze_citation_structure/batch), gap analysis (analyze_citation_gap), trend tracking (analyze_citation_trend), history (get_check_history), and quota management (get_usage). There are no obvious dead ends in the intended workflow.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues