vantage-mcp
# Vantage
[](https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/vantagemcp/vantage-mcp)
Vantage is an AI visibility MCP server that checks whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews cite your site.
Know if AI actually cites you: for which questions, who is cited instead, and whether that is changing. Call it directly from Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP client. No dashboard to interpret, just a straight answer.
## Try it without installing anything
[vantagemcp.dev/check](https://vantagemcp.dev/check) runs a real citation check with no account, no email and no card. Give it a keyword and it returns the measured shape of the answer ChatGPT actually cites for it: whether the answer opens with a list, how long the opening is, how many sources it cites, and which domains those are.
Every answer keeps a permanent page, and they are all listed in [check/sitemap.xml](https://vantagemcp.dev/check/sitemap.xml).
Published on the [Official MCP Registry](https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/) under the domain-verified namespace `dev.vantagemcp/vantage`.
> **Not to be confused with:** [vantage.sh](https://www.vantage.sh), a cloud cost-management company with its own, unrelated MCP server also named Vantage. Different product, same name.
## Install
If your client supports MCP sign-in (OAuth), add `https://vantagemcp.dev/mcp` with no key and sign in: a free account from your email, or an existing key. Otherwise add to your MCP client config:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"vantage": {
"url": "https://vantagemcp.dev/mcp",
"headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" }
}
}
}
```
If your client only starts servers as a local command, use the npm package [`vantage-ai-visibility-mcp`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/vantage-ai-visibility-mcp), which connects to the same hosted server:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"vantage": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "vantage-ai-visibility-mcp"],
"env": { "VANTAGE_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY" }
}
}
}
```
Try it first with no account at all at [vantagemcp.dev/check](https://vantagemcp.dev/check), or get a free API key (30 quota units a month, no card required) at [vantagemcp.dev](https://vantagemcp.dev).
## Tools
### `get_usage`
How much of this billing period's quota is left, before spending any of it.
Costs 0 units - reads Vantage's own record, never calls the paid data provider.
> "How many checks do I have left?"
### `find_cited_questions`
Starts from your domain instead of a keyword: the questions where AI answers already cite it, most asked first. 10 units.
> "What does ChatGPT already cite us for?"
### `check_prompt_coverage`
Which of several prompts actually cite a specific domain, and which don't - up to 10 keywords in one call. ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity (`engine`), 1 unit per keyword per sample. Pass `samples=3` to get "cited in 2 of 3 answers" instead of one yes or no. Each result is remembered for 180 days, so the next check reports what changed (`previous`, `change`, `newly_cited`).
Cited and named are reported separately. An answer can name your brand without linking you (`mentioned_not_cited`: the model already knows you, it just isn't citing you) or link a page it never names. Pass `brand` (e.g. `"Notion"`) so the name check looks for your real brand instead of a guess from the domain.
> "Out of everything we care about, where do we already show up?"
### `get_check_history`
Your earlier `check_prompt_coverage` results for a domain, newest first. 0 units.
> "Did our changes last week move anything?"
### `find_citation_leaders`
Who dominates AI-answer citations for a topic, and whether a domain is among them.
> "Who's winning AI search for this?"
### `analyze_citation_trend`
Month-by-month mention counts for a domain, so you can see whether visibility is growing or fading.
> "Is our AI visibility improving?"
### `analyze_citation_structure`
How the winning AI answer for a topic is actually shaped: list-led, sources cited, opening length.
> "What does a winning answer look like?"
### `analyze_citation_structure_batch`
Same as `analyze_citation_structure`, across up to 10 related topics in one call, for content planning across a cluster.
> "What do winning answers look like across this whole topic cluster?"
### `analyze_citation_gap`
Diffs your own page's structure against the winning AI-cited answer for the same keyword and returns a `fix_brief`: ordered rewrite instructions your agent can carry out on the page (opening, sections, the answer's points your page does not cover, table, sources), ending with one step beyond the page: which community sites or other websites the answer relies on. The brief never contains the cited answer's text.
> "What should I actually change on this page to get cited?"
### Source mix
Every tool that returns cited domains also returns `source_mix`: how much of them are community sites (Reddit, YouTube, X, Quora and similar) and which. A high share means the topic is won by what people say about a brand elsewhere, not by any one site's pages.
### Country and language
Every tool except `get_usage` takes optional `country` (e.g. `"Italy"`) and `language` (e.g. `"it"`), default United States / `en`. Tools that read a live ChatGPT answer work in any supported market; `find_citation_leaders` and `analyze_citation_trend` only have ChatGPT data for the United States in English, so use `platform: "google"` for other countries.
## Example
```
> agent calls find_citation_leaders(
keyword: "best mood tracker app",
platform: "chat_gpt"
)
< response
{
"keyword": "best mood tracker app",
"platform": "chat_gpt",
"top_domains": [
{ "domain": "www.reddit.com", "mentions": 59 },
{ "domain": "apps.apple.com", "mentions": 55 },
{ "domain": "en.wikipedia.org", "mentions": 49 },
{ "domain": "www.makeuseof.com", "mentions": 12 },
{ "domain": "play.google.com", "mentions": 11 }
]
}
```
## Running your own instance
This repo is the MCP server itself: API-key auth, usage metering, one tool per read (see Tools above). Billing and account provisioning are a separate internal service, not included here.
```bash
uv pip install -e .
export DATAFORSEO_USERNAME=...
export DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD=...
# stdio (local MCP client, e.g. Claude Desktop config pointing at this command)
python -m vantage_mcp.server
# streamable-http (network service, bind to loopback behind your own reverse proxy)
export VANTAGE_PORT=8420
python -m vantage_mcp.server --http
```
Requires a [DataForSEO](https://dataforseo.com/) account for the underlying SERP/AI-answer data.
## License
MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference related tools to guide selection. Overlaps such as find_citation_leaders vs. find_cited_questions and analyze_citation_structure vs. analyze_citation_gap are well differentiated by starting point and output.
All tool names use consistent snake_case with a predictable verb_noun or verb_noun_qualifier pattern, e.g. find_citation_leaders, analyze_citation_structure, check_prompt_coverage. The batch variant is clearly named as a suffix, which maintains readability and consistency.
Nine tools is well scoped for an AI citation analytics server, with separate tools for discovery, auditing, diagnosis, tracking, and usage. No tool feels redundant or trivial, and the batch forms are justified by cost/scale concerns.
The surface covers the core lifecycle: quota checks, leaderboard discovery, cited-question discovery, domain trend tracking, prompt coverage auditing, answer-structure analysis, gap analysis, and history. Minor gaps remain, such as no batch form for analyze_citation_gap or analyze_citation_trend, but agents can work around these one keyword at a time.